<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bridge Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info</link>
	<description>Bridge Engineers World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:57:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of External and Internal Prestressing System</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/comparison_of_external_and_internal_prestressing_system.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/comparison_of_external_and_internal_prestressing_system.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[External pre-stressing offers designers the potential to create structures that have a better durability and that can be easily be retrofitted in the case of deterioration or to increase their capacity. This is a very important characteristic for urban bridges for which traffic interruption pose a real problem. It is generally thought that a change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>External pre-stressing offers designers the potential to create structures that have a better durability and that can be easily be retrofitted in the case of deterioration or to increase their capacity. This is a very important characteristic for urban bridges for which traffic interruption pose a real problem.</p>
<p>It is generally thought that a change from internal to external prestressing results in a significant increase in the amount of reinforcement required. A comparative study was performed on a realistic model of a five span continuous single cell box girder by Mr. Oliver Burdet and Mr. Marc Badoux (paper published in 16th Congress of IABSE, 2000). The one design is being done with internal prestressing and the other with external prestressing. The parameter investigated are the bridge span and depth of the girder. They performed preliminary design only to determine the amount of pre-stressing of flexural reinforcement and of shear reinforcement.</p>
<p>An extensive study is carried out on a realistic model of a typical highway bridge. The structure is five span continuous box girder bridge with a constant depth. The side span length is kept as 85% of inner span length. The tendons are laid out in a classic parabolic shape for the internal prestressing and in a trapezoidal layout with two deviators in the span for external prestressing as shown in figure given below. The cross section (shown below) has a constant depth, with a thicker bottom flange on intermediate supports. The webs of the bridge with external prestressing are thinner then the webs of the bridge with internal prestressing (0.5m) to account for easier concreting conditions without web tendons. The bottom flange is 0.2m thick in the span and 0.4m over intermediate support.<br />
<span id="more-174"></span><br />
The pre-stressing was determined on the basis of serviceability criteria in both cases to reach a level of deflection allowable. This level represents the amount used in many structures and typically assures a satisfactory behavior in service. The amount of prestressing required in external prestressing system depends upon the location of deviators in the span. The optimal location for these deviators is at 3/8th and 5/8th of the span but in this study, the span deviators are kept at 1/3 of the span which is close to the optimum. The amount of prestressing required to achieve the same level of deflection with a parabolic cable would be larger.<br />
<a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_geometry.jpg"><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_geometry.jpg" title="prestressing geometry" width="500" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_cross_section.jpg"><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_cross_section.jpg" title="prestressing cross sections" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Parametric study</strong></p>
<p>The comparative parametric study was performed using a simple analytical model of each structure. The two main parameters of the investigation are:-</p>
<p>-	Girder span ( 30 to 80m)<br />
-	Girder depth (girder span to depth ration as15 to 25)<br />
-	</p>
<p>The figure given below shows the required around of prestressing force as a function of main bridge span for bridges with internal and external prestressing. It is clear from the figure that external prestressing requires large amount of pre-stressing force as compare to internal pre-stressing while in larger span external prestressing system require typically less pre-stress for span exceeding 35m to 60m.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_requirement.jpg"><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_requirement.jpg" title="prestressing requirement" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Figure below indicates that required amount of prestresing is with internal prestressing system seems lower for girder depth smaller than 3m and larger above that value. In most cases, these differences are small and it can be concluded that from a serviceability point of view, the two prestressing types are very close to one another.<br />
<a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_requirement_and_girder_depth.jpg"><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_requirement_and_girder_depth.jpg" title="prestressing requirement with girder depth" width="500" /></a><br />
The design of the bridge was then completed to satisfy, ultimate limit state safety requirements. At this limit state, external tendons have a disadvantage because they cannot reach their ultimate capacity. Taking into account the amount of  severability prestressing determined earlier and the minimal reinforcement required, it has been found that bridges with internal prestressing required no additional ULS reinforcement while bridges with external tendon require this type of reinforcement. The amount of additional ULS reinforcement increases with the span of the bridge. It must be noted that requirement of ULS reinforcement is different frame, code to code.<br />
<a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_and_reinforcement.jpg"><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_and_reinforcement.jpg" title="prestressing and minimum reinforcement" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_and_web_shear_reinforcement.jpg"><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/prestressing_and_web_shear_reinforcement.jpg" title="prestressing and web shear reinforcement" width="500" /></a><br />
The amount of shear reinforcement is not very different for both types of prestressing as figure above shows. Bridges with external prestresing have thinner webs which decreases dead load but also decrease the web shear resistance. These two effects partially compensate one another leaving a relatively small advantage to the solution with internal prestressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/comparison_of_external_and_internal_prestressing_system.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protection of Pre-stressing Steel/Anchorages/Deviators</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/protection_of_prestressing_steel_anchorages_deviators.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/protection_of_prestressing_steel_anchorages_deviators.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pre-stressing tendons/steel shall be protected during temporarily exposed stages by coating with water salable oils, grease or other suitable means. The permanent protection to the steel shall be provided by the cement grout, nuclear-grade grease or other suitable means. The external exposed steel components of deviations supporting brackets etc shall be protected by clear epoxy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-stressing tendons/steel shall be protected during temporarily exposed stages by coating with water salable oils, grease or other suitable means. The permanent protection to the steel shall be provided by the cement grout, nuclear-grade grease or other suitable means. The external exposed steel components of deviations supporting brackets etc shall be protected by clear epoxy paint coating. </p>
<p>The anchorages and exposed free lengths of cables (left for de-tensioning) shall be properly housed in steel boxes and filled with protective agents such as nuclear grade grease or other suitable material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/protection_of_prestressing_steel_anchorages_deviators.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rehabilitation of Bridges with Lightweight Concrete</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/rehabilitation_of_bridges_with_lightweight_concrete.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/rehabilitation_of_bridges_with_lightweight_concrete.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deck of the Puttesund Bridge in Norway was rehabilitated by replacing concrete sidewalls with aluminum replacing portion of slab and surfacing with lightweight concrete and installing external pre-stressing. This bridge was original constructed in 1970 and rehabilitated in 2002 to extend its life according to current demands. Puttesund Bridge, Norway]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deck of the Puttesund Bridge in Norway was rehabilitated by replacing concrete sidewalls with aluminum replacing portion of slab and surfacing with lightweight concrete and installing external pre-stressing. This bridge was original constructed in 1970 and rehabilitated in 2002 to extend its life according to current demands.<br />
<img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/puttesund_bridge_norway.jpg" title="puttesund bridge norway" /><br />
<strong>Puttesund Bridge, Norway</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/rehabilitation_of_bridges_with_lightweight_concrete.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shear Strengthening of Headstocks or Pier Cap</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/shear_strengthening_of_headstocks_or_pier_cap.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/shear_strengthening_of_headstocks_or_pier_cap.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The headstocks of the Hawthorne and Morrison Bridges in USA were strengthened by External Pre-stressing. A system of externally mounted post-tensioned bars has been used to increase the compressive strength of the concrete caps thus increasing the load carrying capacity of the head stocks / pier cap. A steel I-beam was used as an anchoring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headstocks of the Hawthorne and Morrison Bridges in USA were strengthened by External Pre-stressing. A system of externally mounted post-tensioned bars has been used to increase the compressive strength of the concrete caps thus increasing the load carrying capacity of the head stocks / pier cap. A steel I-beam was used as an anchoring block on each end of the head stocks. Figure below shows the typical application of the external pre-stressing in head stocks / pier cap strengthening.<br />
<img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/morrison_bridge_headstock_strengthening.jpg" alt="morrison_bridge_headstock_strengthening" title="morrison_bridge_headstock_strengthening" width="362" height="324" /><br />
<strong>Morrison Bridge Headstock Strengthening, USA</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/shear_strengthening_of_headstocks_or_pier_cap.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flexural Strengthening of Bridges Girders</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/flexural_strengthening_of_bridges_girders.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/flexural_strengthening_of_bridges_girders.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Indonesia, two bridges, Condet Bridges (steel beam and concrete slab composite bridge built in 1989) and Kemlaka Gede Bridge (single span steel beam bridge) were strengthened by external pre-stressing to enable it to carry full design loading. Both are very similar flexure strengthening projects using external pre-stressing. View of the Condet Bridge after Strengthening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Indonesia, two bridges, Condet Bridges (steel beam and concrete slab composite bridge built in 1989) and Kemlaka Gede Bridge (single span steel beam bridge) were strengthened by external pre-stressing to enable it to carry full design loading. Both are very similar flexure strengthening projects using external pre-stressing.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/condet_bridge.jpg" alt="condet_bridge" title="condet_bridge" width="450" height="320" /><br />
<strong>View of the Condet Bridge after Strengthening</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/kemlaka_gede_bridge.jpg" alt="kemlaka_gede_bridge" title="kemlaka_gede_bridge" width="450" height="318" /><br />
<strong>Kemlaka Gede Bridge after Strengthening</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/flexural_strengthening_of_bridges_girders.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strengthening of Bridges using External PreStressing</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/strengthening_of_bridges_using_external_prestressing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/strengthening_of_bridges_using_external_prestressing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[External pre-stressing has been also considered as one of the most powerful techniques for structural strengthening and rehabilitation works. External pre-stressing is preferred for bridge strengthening projects due to its following advantages. 1. Minimal disruption to traffic 2. Low weight of the additional component 3. Speed and short duration of construction 4. Low costs involved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>External pre-stressing has been also considered as one of the most powerful techniques for structural strengthening and rehabilitation works. External pre-stressing is preferred for bridge strengthening projects due to its following advantages.</p>
<p>1. Minimal disruption to traffic<br />
2. Low weight of the additional component<br />
3. Speed and short duration of construction<br />
4. Low costs involved<br />
5. Future re-stressing operations could be carried out quickly and conventionally if required.</p>
<p>Some projects are listed here involving application of external pre-stressing in strengthening of projects.<br />
a) <a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/flexural_strengthening_of_bridges_girders.html" rel="bookmark">Flexural Strengthening of Bridges Girders</a></p>
<p>b) <a href="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/shear_strengthening_of_headstocks_or_pier_cap.html" rel="bookmark">Shear Strengthening of Headstocks or Pier Caps</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/strengthening_of_bridges_using_external_prestressing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightweight Concrete Bridge with External PreStressing</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/lightweight_concrete_bridge_with_external_prestressing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/lightweight_concrete_bridge_with_external_prestressing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another development in the bridge industry is the use of lightweight concrete in construction of new bridges as well as rehabilitation of existing bridges. Sirarika River Bridge is Japan was constructed with lightweight concrete with external pre-stressing. This was first bridge in Japan, which adopted HLA concrete for a PSC bridge. This is a three [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another development in the bridge industry is the use of lightweight concrete in construction of new bridges as well as rehabilitation of existing bridges. Sirarika River Bridge is Japan was constructed with lightweight concrete with external pre-stressing. This was first bridge in Japan, which adopted HLA concrete for a PSC bridge. This is a three spans continuous box girder bridge with pre-stressing in the longitudinal direction being provided competently by external tendons. Another important feature in this bridge is that transparent sheets were used to cover for external tendons. This facilitates proper monitoring of grouting of external tendons to prevent any corrosion. It is expected with improved protection to steel external tendons, the use of this technology will become more popular.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/shirarika_river_bridge.jpg" alt="shirarika_river_bridge" title="shirarika_river_bridge" width="450" height="373" /></p>
<p><strong>Shirarika River Bridge Made of HLA Concrete</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/transparent_sheaths.jpg" alt="transparent_sheaths" title="transparent_sheaths" width="450" height="373" /><br />
<strong>Transparent Sheaths used for Inspection of Grouting</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/lightweight_concrete_bridge_with_external_prestressing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Composite Bridges using External Prestressing</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/composite_bridges_using_external_prestressing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/composite_bridges_using_external_prestressing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[External pre-stressing has been used not only in concrete bridges but also in composite bridges either in classical composite bridges or in new type of bridges with different ways associating concreting and steel. The use of pre-stressing concrete box girder bridges with corrugated steel webs is being constructed widely considering the cost effectiveness to construct [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>External pre-stressing has been used not only in concrete bridges but also in composite bridges either in classical composite bridges or in new type of bridges with different ways associating concreting and steel.</p>
<p>The use of pre-stressing concrete box girder bridges with corrugated steel webs is being constructed widely considering the cost effectiveness to construct new bridges. In these structures, the concrete webs are placed with corrugated steel plates to reduce the self weight which also simplifies the construction.</p>
<p>Figure below shows the typical section of a pre-stressed concrete bridge with corrugated webs. Basically, the pre-stress is provided by means of bonded tendons arranged in the upper and lower flanges of concrete slab and unbounded external tendon for webs, since the webs are made of steel plates. It is studied and concluded that a reduction of self weight of about 25% can be achieved in this kind of structures compared to conventional PSC box girder bridges.</p>
<p>Number of bridges with corrugated steel webs has been constructed worldwide. Some examples of such bridges constructed will these techniques are described below:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/prestressed_concrete_bridge_with_corrugated_webs.jpg" alt="prestressed_concrete_bridge_with_corrugated_webs" title="prestressed_concrete_bridge_with_corrugated_webs" width="452" height="215" /></p>
<p><strong>Typical section of a Pre-stressed concrete Bridge with Corrugated Webs</strong></p>
<p>The Givizon-Miyuki Bridge has five spans with a total length of 210m, which was the first bridge to be constructed in Japan using incremental launching method. Weathering steel plates were used for the web. The feature of this bridge is that stud dowel connectors were adopted for the connection between concrete and steel plate. Further, the connection between steel plates in the direction of the bridge axis was by means of bolt connection of the end plates. This method was adopted considering the aesthetic appearance of the bridge.</p>
<p>The Shivasawa Bridge has a span of 50m was also constructed in Japan using supported formwork. The unique feature of this bridge is that “perforbard” connection was adopted for the first time in Japan to connect the steel web and lower flange of concrete slab.</p>
<p>The Kogawauchi-gawa Bridge with a total length of 160m was constructed by the cantilever launching method. Pointed steel plates were used for the web.</p>
<p>The above examples illustrate by the use of external pre-stressing how composite bridges can be designed to enhance better performance by effective use of materials such as steel and concrete.<br />
<img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/shirasawa_bridge.jpg" alt="shirasawa_bridge" title="shirasawa_bridge" width="450" height="329" /><br />
<strong>Complete View of Shirasawa Bridge</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/composite_bridges_using_external_prestressing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Types of Application of External Prestressing</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/types_of_application_of_external_prestressing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/types_of_application_of_external_prestressing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In total, then a three types of applications of external pre-stressing applicable to bridges which are mentioned as below:- (i) In the first type, the unbounded pre-stressing tendons/cables comprise the total pre-stressing force. Segmentally constructed bridge and cast-in-situ box girder bridge superstructure using external cables are an example of this category. (ii) In the second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In total, then a three types of applications of external pre-stressing applicable to bridges which are mentioned as below:-</p>
<p>(i)	In the first type, the unbounded pre-stressing tendons/cables comprise the total pre-stressing force. Segmentally constructed bridge and cast-in-situ box girder bridge superstructure using external cables are an example of this category.</p>
<p>(ii)	In the second type, the unbounded elements act as part of total pre-stressing force, the other part being provided by bounded pre-stressing elements embedded in concrete. External pre-stressing provided for repair/rehabilitation/strengthening of existing PSC bridge is an example of this type. The external pre-stress may or may not contribute to the enhancement of ultimate strength.</p>
<p>(iii)	In the third type, the external pre-stressing is used as a means of applying external load acting in the desired direction and quantum and the deformation of the structure due to subsequent live load-both in service and under ultimate condition do not affect the magnitude and direction significantly. The external pre-stressing is taken as equivalent load only without considering its contribution to the strength of the structure. This type of application is used in strengthening of existing RCC structure by using pre-stressing elements to relieve part of the dead load effects.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/conventional_tendon_placement.jpg" alt="conventional_tendon_placement" title="conventional_tendon_placement" width="390" height="208" /></br ><br />
<img src="http://www.bridgeengineering.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/tendon_with_large_eccentricity.jpg" alt="tendon_with_large_eccentricity" title="tendon_with_large_eccentricity" width="412" height="208" /><br />
<strong>tendon placement in external post-tensioning</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/types_of_application_of_external_prestressing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disadvantages Of External Prestressing</title>
		<link>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/disadvantages_of_external_prestressing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/disadvantages_of_external_prestressing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Prestressing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridgeengineering.info/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The various disadvantages of external pre-stressing are described as below: (i) Only straight profile of tendon is possible. (ii) Additional cost for ducts and anchorages. (iii) Diffusion of Post-Tensioning forces. (iv) External tendons are more sensitive to fire and more easily attackable by the vandals. (v) The pre-stressing force disappears over the overall length of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The various disadvantages of external pre-stressing are described as below:<br />
(i)	Only straight profile of tendon is possible.</p>
<p>(ii)	Additional cost for ducts and anchorages.</p>
<p>(iii)	Diffusion of Post-Tensioning forces.</p>
<p>(iv)	External tendons are more sensitive to fire and more easily attackable by the vandals.</p>
<p>(v)	The pre-stressing force disappears over the overall length of the tendon once a section of tendon is broken.</p>
<p>(vi)	External tendons are protected by HDPE ducts which are fully cement grouted or wax filled which result in a higher initial material cost for the pre-stress system.</p>
<p>(vii)	Under ultimate bending conditions external tendons require more pre-stressing to generate the same moment of resistance.</p>
<p>(viii)	Anchorage points and deviators are subjected to high concentrations of forces which need to be properly tied into the structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bridgeengineering.info/disadvantages_of_external_prestressing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

